[45854] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (vince@penguin-power.com)
Tue Feb 26 08:23:02 2002
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 09:22:19 -0400
From: vince@penguin-power.com
To: Vadim Antonov <avg@exigengroup.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Message-ID: <20020226132219.GA4215@penguin-power.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202252334250.1535-100000@arch.exigengroup.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> 4) exponential fee increments for registering domains with the same
> payer's physical address and/or name.
Yeah so I don't like this suggestion at all. What if a company has several business units each with its own domain name, with the same address, and with a shared accounting department. Or an ISP that offers to pay for its customers domain if they prepay for a year. Or someone like me who owns several domains?
Nope I really dont' like this suggestion, the other ones seem to be more thought out.
-Vince
