[45435] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Fwd: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan Hollis)
Fri Feb 1 14:29:07 2002
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 11:28:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
To: Daniel Golding <dgolding@sockeye.com>
Cc: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>,
"Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol@JustThe.net>,
"'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <GKEFKKIKGCMICPKBAEIMIEMACFAA.dgolding@sockeye.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0202011124160.10150-100000@sasami.anime.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Daniel Golding wrote:
> The other interesting part of this is that the Comcast T&C's DON'T mention
> NAT, and it looks like they don't have a "NAT POLICE" group, scouting for
> violators on their network.
So phillymjs is a liar?
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/01/24/1957236&mode=thread
-Dan
--
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
