[45425] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Fwd: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Marc Pierrat)
Fri Feb 1 11:37:15 2002
From: "Marc Pierrat" <marc@sunchar.com>
To: <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>,
"David Charlap" <David.Charlap@marconi.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 11:35:07 -0500
Message-ID: <NFBBKCHEKLKMKJELNNPPCEAKCEAA.marc@sunchar.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <200202011617.g11GHuqI007792@foo-bar-baz.cc.vt.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:18 AM
To: David Charlap
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Fwd: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"=20
RFC2734 IPv4 over IEEE 1394. P. Johansson. December 1999. (Format:
TXT=3D69314 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)
Better yet: use RFC1149 or 2549 which adds QoS... just think of the =
possiblities.
