[45324] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Fwd: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andy Walden)
Thu Jan 31 11:08:43 2002
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:05:33 -0600 (CST)
From: Andy Walden <andy@tigerteam.net>
To: "Martin J. Levy" <mahtin@mahtin.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020131074533.01e4e9f0@wheresmymailserver.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201310858490.6003-100000@vision.tigerteam.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Martin J. Levy wrote:
>
> I got this forwarded to me. I'm not impressed.
>
> Based upon the general desire for providers to have NAT'ed users and to
> reduce IP-space usage where appropriate, does this make sense? I can
> understand the providers desire to increase revenue, but I don't believe
> this is a good way to do it.
Slashdot, the tabloid of the tech world. I believe if you read through all
the comments no one ever came up with any proof of this and reading
through Commcast's AUP doesn't reveal this policy either. I think it was
largely trollbait.
andy
--
PGP Key Available at http://www.tigerteam.net/andy/pgp
