[44924] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Automated DLR conflict detection
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (EA Louie)
Mon Dec 31 03:00:22 2001
Message-ID: <021b01c191d1$457e9300$c4081518@elcjn1.sdca.home.com>
From: "EA Louie" <elouie@yahoo.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 00:00:51 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jesper Skriver" <jesper@skriver.dk>
> >
> > Actually I would be much happy with a Certified something. I can't
> > figure out why people want a CCIE to run their Juniper routers.
>
> Because a CCIE is about a lot more than knowing how to configure a Cisco
> device, very few will pass a CCIE test without _knowing_ the technology,
> and what they are doing, and that is the same regardless of the label on
> the equipment.
That may have been true during your genre of CCIE's, but not with the latest
round of CCIE's, my friends... you should see the posts I see on the ccie
lab mailing lists. Its enough to scare even me, and I don't scare easily.
The latest round of study materials is creating a "puppy mill" of CCIEs -
inexperienced, money-hungry, power-conscious, and absolutely clueless. I
wouldn't give most of them the enable passwords to my routers...
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
