[43846] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: EXAMPLE: ### xxx Canada detected a penetration attempt from
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Rubenstein)
Fri Oct 26 15:18:44 2001
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 15:14:56 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
To: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
Cc: Christopher Wawak <cwawak@eden.rutgers.edu>,
"nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0110261207050.25147-100000@anime.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.33.0110261514180.1236-100000@phosphorus.hq.nac.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I couldn't care less.
And, I'm not saying it for affect. It's up to us to protect ourselves.
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Christopher Wawak wrote:
> > Well, not exactly. Looking into the windows or checking the doorknobs is
> > more akin to looking at your directory structre on your computer or file
> > ... Scanning is more like going through the phone book or looking at the
> > names on mailboxes in a neighborhood....
>
> So you dont mind if people portscan your network?
>
> -Dan
> --
> [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
>
>
