[43842] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James Thomason)
Fri Oct 26 15:04:30 2001

Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 11:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: James Thomason <james@divide.org>
To: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
Cc: Mike Batchelor <mikebat@tmcs.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0110261147290.23617-100000@anime.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0110261150390.2242-100000@www1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


PING www.army.mil (140.183.234.10): 56 data bytes
^C
--- www.army.mil ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss

Am I a terrorist now too?

On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Dan Hollis wrote:

> 
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Mike Batchelor wrote:
> > > <rant>
> > > 	Digital Island is certainly not alone in their practice of
> > > assuming an opt-in stance.
> > I think you know that for an operation like Digital Island or Akamai, asking
> > every network operator permission to probe is for all practical purposes,
> > impossible.  Insisting on opt-in is insisting on these companies going out
> > of business, or not even starting up at all.
> 
> I wonder if Digital Island "probes" .mil sites.
> 
> -Dan
> -- 
> [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
> 
> 


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post