[43250] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verio Peering Question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (E.B. Dreger)
Tue Oct 2 22:18:56 2001
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 02:12:15 +0000 (GMT)
From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Cc: Jeff Mcadams <jeffm@iglou.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <134861425.1002066535@[195.224.237.69]>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0110030209400.758-100000@www.everquick.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 23:48:55 +0100
> From: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
[ snip ]
> Aside: It's interesting that all the anti-filtering arguments
> are coming from those who are customers of Filterer's peers. We
[ snip ]
Perhaps those who disagree with this type of filtering avoid the
upstreams in question?
If customer of Filterer understands what's happening, and doesn't
mind losing redundant paths to smaller networks, _that's_ what I
want to hear. AFAIK, that hasn't been posted, either.
Eddy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@brics.com>
To: blacklist@brics.com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT
send mail to <blacklist@brics.com>, or you are likely to be blocked.
