|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 23:22:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk> Cc: <nanog@merit.edu> In-Reply-To: <1205260731.1001709412@[195.224.237.69]> Message-ID: <20011002231707.X10757-100000@sequoia.muada.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Alex Bligh wrote: > There is much evidence > to suggest the free market is good at sorting things like this out. > Currently, however, we have misattribution of costs. > SMD suggested this a long time ago, for routes in general (i.e. not > just long ones). He's right (at least if measured over a long > enough time window :-p ) Yes, this could be interesting. I announce one route to UUNET, but they send me over 800 (not counting transit). So that should generate some income for me... I don't think it would be very hard to identify who should pay, but it might be difficult to decide who should receive the money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |