[41781] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roeland Meyer)
Wed Sep 12 04:51:40 2001
Message-ID: <EA9368A5B1010140ADBF534E4D32C728069EA2@condor.mhsc.com>
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
To: 'Dan Hollis' <goemon@anime.net>,
Vadim Antonov <avg@exigengroup.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 01:39:31 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
|> From: Dan Hollis [mailto:goemon@anime.net]
|> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 12:47 AM
|>
|> On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Vadim Antonov wrote:
|> > Locked bulletproof door to the cockpit. Survelliance cameras in the
|> > passenger compartments. That all which was needed to foil
|> the attack. Now
|> > I think it's time to ask why this isn't the standard procedure?
|>
|> Or they could just fly plainclothes armed marshals on US flights.
|>
|> Apparently they tried this years ago, but stopped because it was
|> "uneconomical". I guess the airlines have figured out how to
|> put a dollar
|> amount on human lives.
excuse me, but I don't think that the airlines were paying for those
marshals. Please look towards uncle sugar, for that gaff.
