[41474] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: end2end? (was: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan Hollis)
Mon Sep 10 17:34:04 2001
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
To: Brandin L Claar <claar@arl.psu.edu>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20010910172042.A10225@arl.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0109101429310.19770-100000@anime.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Brandin L Claar wrote:
> That is what I truly love about NAT. It breaks totally inane filth like
> path mtu discovery. I'm sure if someone had an MTU < ethernet on an
> internal router they wouldn't need NAT breaking path MTU discovery to
> bring it to their attention.
You dont need NAT to break path mtu discovery. Solaris and Microsoft
Windows will do the job just fine on their own.
-Dan
--
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
