[41476] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: end2end? (was: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Fletcher E Kittredge)
Mon Sep 10 19:46:41 2001
Message-Id: <200109102344.f8ANiZw21809@valen.gwi.net>
To: claar@arl.psu.edu
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Reply-To: nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Sep 2001 17:20:42 EDT."
<20010910172042.A10225@arl.psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 19:44:35 -0400
From: Fletcher E Kittredge <fkittred@gwi.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 17:20:42 -0400 Brandin L Claar wrote:
> That is what I truly love about NAT. It breaks totally inane filth like
> path mtu discovery. I'm sure if someone had an MTU < ethernet on an
> internal router they wouldn't need NAT breaking path MTU discovery to
> bring it to their attention.
So... You do much 1, 10, 100 gigabit/sec Ethernet there?
> Brandin Claar
> Network Analyst
On the Internet, no one knows you are a dog.
> Penn State Applied Research Lab
I see, school is back in session.
