[41440] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: once again: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vadim Antonov)
Mon Sep 10 01:10:42 2001
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 22:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Vadim Antonov <avg@exigengroup.com>
To: Doug Clements <dsclements@linkline.com>
Cc: "NANOG (E-mail)" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <B7C12F14.206B%dsclements@linkline.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10109092208050.5809-100000@arch.exigengroup.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Doug Clements wrote:
>
> You want h.323, then don't do NAT. This is very simple, and this thread has
> gone on long enough.
Or get an H.323 gateway which combines NAT functions and H.323
"switchboard" (i.e. CTI, conference control, etc). My previous employer
(Genesys, now part of Alcatel) makes one.
--vadim
