[41438] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: once again: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff Mcadams)
Sun Sep 9 22:07:19 2001
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 22:05:21 -0400
From: Jeff Mcadams <jeffm@iglou.com>
To: Doug Clements <dsclements@linkline.com>
Cc: "NANOG (E-mail)" <nanog@merit.edu>
Message-ID: <20010909220521.A29256@iglou.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <B7C12F14.206B%dsclements@linkline.com>; from dsclements@linkline.com on Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 02:37:09PM -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Also sprach Doug Clements
>Um, I think we got doubly off-topic. Nobody is talking about forcing
>NAT on all their customers.
Talk to Cincinnati Bell/Zoomtown. They are almost, but not quite,
forcing NAT on, not only their customers, but the customers of any ISP
that uses Zoomtown to provide DSL in the Cincinnati area.
>this thread has gone on long enough.
I will heartily agree with this statement, though, for sure.
--
Jeff McAdams Email: jeffm@iglou.com
Head Network Administrator Voice: (502) 966-3848
IgLou Internet Services (800) 436-4456
