[41431] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bob K)
Sun Sep 9 17:41:33 2001
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 17:38:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bob K <melange@yip.org>
To: "NANOG (E-mail)" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20010909172431.F17334@puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0109091736210.52732-100000@pi.yip.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Jared Mauch wrote:
> I think you are obviously missing the point that people
> use nat to prevent inbound connections as part of their security
> measures.
Every firewall I've ever seen allows you to do the exact same thing
without NAT.
--
Bob <melange@yip.org> | Yes. I know. That is, indeed, *not* mayonnaise.
