[41430] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Sun Sep 9 17:25:26 2001
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 17:24:31 -0400
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.Nether.net>
To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Cc: Circusnuts <Circusnuts@home.com>,
Adam McKenna <adam-nanog@flounder.net>,
"NANOG (E-mail)" <nanog@merit.edu>
Message-ID: <20010909172431.F17334@puck.nether.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1642013105.1000073407@[169.254.198.40]>; from alex@alex.org.uk on Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 10:10:08PM +0100
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 10:10:08PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
>
> --On Sunday, 09 September, 2001 9:21 AM -0400 Circusnuts
> <Circusnuts@home.com> wrote:
>
> > As soon as IPV6 comes online, NAT will offer almost
> > no value add.
I think you are obviously missing the point that people
use nat to prevent inbound connections as part of their security
measures.
> Exhale now
:)
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
