[40871] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: multi-homing fixes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brian Whalen)
Fri Aug 24 00:54:41 2001
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 21:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Brian Whalen <bri@sonicboom.org>
To: Joe Abley <jabley@automagic.org>
Cc: John Fraizer <nanog@Overkill.EnterZone.Net>,
Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>,
"'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20010824004231.V11481@buddha.home.automagic.org>
Message-ID: <20010823215107.X16096-100000@cx175057-a.ocnsd1.sdca.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Well I remember seeing a message on groupstudy where somone from the tac
came on and made a statement along the lines that a substantial quantity
of cases they get are a result of non Cisco memory.
Brian "Sonic" Whalen
Success = Preparation + Opportunity
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 09:31:29PM -0700, Brian Whalen wrote:
> > Yes and this non cisco ram can make Cisco's tac have a cor or two..
>
> Cisco have certified a number of RAM vendors; you can happily buy
> RAM from them (at non-inflated prices) without voiding your warranty
> or causing an abnormal palpitations in the TAC.
>
> For example:
>
> http://www.kingston.com/memory/routerzone/default.asp
>
> Last time I priced RAM upgrades for RSP4s (which was a few years
> ago now) cisco list price was around five times greater than
> Kingston's price for cisco-approved SIMMs. Hooray, etc.
>
>
> Joe
>
