[40807] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan Hollis)
Wed Aug 22 20:51:53 2001
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 17:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
To: Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com>
Cc: Nanog <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.20.0108221717430.8992-100000@alive.znep.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0108221746180.26704-100000@anime.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Marc Slemko wrote:
> Now, sure, you certainly have to have agreements between devices
> in various contexts, but what is and isn't a "working" configuration
> and why is a bit more complex. A can't-go-wrong simplification,
> of course, is "always make sure all devices on the same L2 have
> the same MTU"...
One approach would be separate VLANs for ge and fe peers. Just set the mtu
separately for the virtual interface in each separate VLAN.
-Dan
--
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
