[39396] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Broadband v. baseband ... again?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Jul 5 15:15:08 2001
Message-Id: <200107051913.f65JDhZ01529@foo-bar-baz.cc.vt.edu>
To: Jeff Harper <jharper@verizon.com>
Cc: "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 05 Jul 2001 13:46:36 CDT."
<93B9C6964541D3119F350008C7F445579BE0F7@dfwmsx05.ins.gte.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1002006353P";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 15:13:43 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_-1002006353P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 05 Jul 2001 13:46:36 CDT, Jeff Harper <jharper@verizon.com> said:
> Well, in my opinion, networking is an exact science, it's very binary, and
> the definitions must follow suit. It has to be. Chaos would erupt if it
> wasn't, cats and dogs living together, mass hysteria!
Which is why 100BaseT autoconfigure works so great that there's never any
need to manually nail a card down to full/half duplex. ;)
/Valdis (who has been doing <guess what> of late ;)
--==_Exmh_-1002006353P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Exmh version 2.4 05/15/2001
iQA/AwUBO0S8Z3At5Vm009ewEQJJWgCeJYlMshbscOthZFybUfqcb5GYLDIAoIXF
tPvciTDC9uVwJu3lm4bWD/iU
=MZ6+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_-1002006353P--
