[39163] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is this normal?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Jun 27 11:38:35 2001
Message-Id: <200106271537.f5RFbrg23879@foo-bar-baz.cc.vt.edu>
To: Scott Francis <darkuncle@darkuncle.net>
Cc: Larry Diffey <ldiffey@technologyforward.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 27 Jun 2001 00:19:08 PDT."
<20010627001908.M4856@darkuncle.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-567490977P";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:37:53 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_-567490977P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 00:19:08 PDT, Scott Francis said:
> ugh. you have just raised the skeleton of one of the top 3 most popular
> religious wars in this forum. There is no consensus on this. I personally
> think it's bad form, but as these addresses are unlikely to appear in anyth=
> ing
> other than a traceroute, it's probably not hurting anything.
It also hoses PMTU Discovery if your router does RFC1918 ingress filtering
and one of the 10.x.x.x router addresses sends back a 'must fragment'.
But hey, we all knew that. ;)
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Operating Systems Analyst
Virginia Tech
--==_Exmh_-567490977P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Exmh version 2.2 06/16/2000
iQA/AwUBOzn90XAt5Vm009ewEQLH4ACeMwS+rKXxqzBdsK08LwucXWpvfq8An2QN
WXGZc917DqhhpTvSKSlhe9UL
=oSE6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_-567490977P--
