[39159] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is this normal?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Wojtek Zlobicki)
Wed Jun 27 07:19:08 2001
Message-ID: <002101c0fefa$e38d9600$020a0a0a@wojtek>
From: "Wojtek Zlobicki" <wojtekz@idirect.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:18:27 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 11:35:55PM -0700, Larry Diffey exclaimed:
> 3 180 ms 20 ms 30 ms 10.0.242.77
> 4 80 ms 50 ms 20 ms 10.0.242.73
>> As you can see, the third and fourth hop are advertising 10's and ?
>> wouldn't think a provider would want traffic passing through a private
>>address space.
>ugh. you have just raised the skeleton of one of the top 3 most popular
>religious wars in this forum. There is no consensus on this. I personally
>think it's bad form, but as these addresses are unlikely to appear in
>anything other than a traceroute, it's probably not hurting anything.
What if I were to tell you that some of these "so called private"
servers/machines, have telnet open to the @Home world ? Now that is a
problem. Its one thing to route these IP's among your equipment, its
another to not restrict customer access to them.
