[38829] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: standards for giving out blocks of IP addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David R Huberman)
Sat Jun 16 16:30:11 2001
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 13:29:36 -0700 (MST)
From: David R Huberman <huberman@gblx.net>
To: Charles Scott <cscott@gaslightmedia.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0106161611150.12628-100000@harbor.gaslightmedia.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0106161326380.20746-100000@shell1.phx.gblx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> > - Both are judged to have used their existing assignment 'efficiently' if
> > they have used 80% of it.
>
> Nope. But I give up.
You can't request an additional assignment of address space until you have
efficiently utilized your existing address space. Why "Nope."?
Otherwise, how can your request for additional address space be deemed
justified? "We can't give you more - you still have plenty left from
your last assignment."
