[38828] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: standards for giving out blocks of IP addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Charles Scott)
Sat Jun 16 16:14:35 2001
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 16:13:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Charles Scott <cscott@gaslightmedia.com>
To: David R Huberman <huberman@gblx.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0106161242390.20746-100000@shell1.phx.gblx.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0106161611150.12628-100000@harbor.gaslightmedia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, David R Huberman wrote:
> As I suspected, we're arguing over mis-communication brought about by poor
> phrasing.
>
> - End-users' address space determinations are based on 25-50.
Yep.
> - ISPs' address space determinations are based on their three-month needs.
Yep.
> - Both are judged to have used their existing assignment 'efficiently' if
> they have used 80% of it.
Nope. But I give up.
> As Randy Bush likes to say, I'm glad my competitors make life so
> difficult for their customers.
Ain't that the truth.
Chuck
