[37913] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Possible solution? (e-mail parcel vs. FTP)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri May 25 15:50:43 2001
Message-Id: <200105251659.f4PGx1113664@foo-bar-baz.cc.vt.edu>
To: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 25 May 2001 15:49:54 BST."
<Pine.LNX.4.20.0105251542560.30647-100000@www.everquick.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_488324544P";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 12:59:01 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_488324544P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 25 May 2001 15:49:54 BST, "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net> said:
> Methinks that it's proxy time. Why not hack the popular MTAs so that they
> take attachments, spool them in a Web-accessible directory, then modify
> the message.
>
> Just like e-cards...
message/external-body was first described in RFC1341, in June 1992. Hardly
a new idea...
/Valdis
--==_Exmh_488324544P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Exmh version 2.2 06/16/2000
iQA/AwUBOw6PVXAt5Vm009ewEQKmUwCgoIEkMTXf7J3vqtYjqqRTD5VrKF4An1Go
7bl4tvDuNGHH9PkA4d0K+cCH
=DSdi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_488324544P--
