[37906] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Possible solution? (e-mail parcel vs. FTP)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (E.B. Dreger)
Fri May 25 14:14:36 2001
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 17:03:48 +0000 (GMT)
From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <200105251659.f4PGx1113664@foo-bar-baz.cc.vt.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0105251701380.32322-100000@www.everquick.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 12:59:01 -0400
> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
>
> message/external-body was first described in RFC1341, in June 1992.
I was not aware of that.
> Hardly a new idea...
Not a new idea, but where are the implementations? :-)
That said, I have another RFC that I must read.
Eddy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc.
EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: (316) 794-8922
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@brics.com>
To: blacklist@brics.com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT
send mail to <blacklist@brics.com>, or you are likely to be blocked.
