[37745] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Stealth Blocking
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Wed May 23 18:51:44 2001
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 16:40:34 -0400
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010523164034.D14188@eiv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eqp4TxRxnD4KrmFZ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3B0BEBF4.67E1034A@appliedtheory.com>; from rsharp@appliedtheory.com on Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:57:24PM -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--eqp4TxRxnD4KrmFZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:57:24PM -0400, Robert Sharp wrote:
>=20
> making that choice for other people. MAPS does this with their blacking =
of
> traffic. This type of power in the hands of a single person/organization=
is
> wrong.=20
MAPS doesn't make any choice for other people, MAPS only provides
documentation of the choices they've made for themselves.
They're the email equivalent of Consumer Reports. Nobody is forced to
use their lists.
> I would propose a system whereas there are multiple representatives from
> many viewpoints to make VERY SERIOUS decisions like this.
Then stop proposing it, and actually create it. If people agree with you,
they'll join you. If they prefer MAPS, take the hint that you're wrong
and go away.
--eqp4TxRxnD4KrmFZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjsMIEIACgkQEcl9bQ0RMt1qdgCff8mznAOS1zIZHZcNWMfE6TP7
mLkAn31rqgXpQLgfShaSe+YS8ddCMFd0
=8KSG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--eqp4TxRxnD4KrmFZ--
