[37742] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Stealth Blocking
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed May 23 17:30:18 2001
Message-Id: <200105231934.f4NJYme26453@foo-bar-baz.cc.vt.edu>
To: Robert Sharp <rsharp@appliedtheory.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 23 May 2001 14:36:15 EDT."
<3B0C031F.8A177D18@appliedtheory.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_509359704P";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 15:34:48 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_509359704P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 23 May 2001 14:36:15 EDT, Robert Sharp said:
> And if you use the MAPS list by your choice you are most definetly filtering out email
> or traffic for people who are legitimate. I know I have been filtered before. MAPS is
> using a very large hammer to kill a not so large bug.
Hmm.. you won't configure it correctly. RFC2505 is "Best Current Practice".
You get filtered because you won't configure it correctly.
You say you've been filtered *before* because you won't configure it correctly.
Yes, we *admit* we're using a large hammer. Bouncing your e-mail didn't
get your attention. Maybe irate users will get your attention. But I
am doubting it.
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Operating Systems Analyst
Virginia Tech
--==_Exmh_509359704P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Exmh version 2.2 06/16/2000
iQA/AwUBOwwQ2HAt5Vm009ewEQIj4gCfZtGaZo5zep33p6KRqrCumhOiTKUAoNmC
NJOFcuBh6fug1C2XqCqzeqeW
=Gtj1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_509359704P--
