|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 09:20:08 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net> To: Arnold Nipper <arnold@nipper.de> Cc: nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <20010420150524.A13735@gateway.nipper.de> Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.05.10104200918560.2128-100000@kerplewie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu > ... you may easily deduct News traffic from being billed. BTW: tell me how > do you exclude News Traffic if you count the 95th %ile? Why should you? packets are packets; does your upstream provider charge you less for news? Are you magically capable of moving news across your own network cheaper than web traffic? > Billing based upon total bytes transferred is IMHO verfy fair and attractive > from the point of a customer's view and tends to be a nightmare from an ISP's > pespective especially if you don't just count bytes but are looking at the > IP-addresses involved. Agreed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |