[36056] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Clear Channel on a T1
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rachel Warren)
Fri Mar 23 09:05:13 2001
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:06:57 -0500
From: Rachel Warren <rachel@telco-bitch.com>
To: CARL.P.HIRSCH@sargentlundy.com
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010323090657.A2721@5ess.telco-bitch.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <OFC23079E1.98769693-ON86256A17.0064DF79@sargentlundy.com>; from CARL.P.HIRSCH@sargentlundy.com on Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 12:27:51PM -0600
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> Here's a document that further obfuscates the matter for me -
> http://www.comtest.com/tutorials/t1.html
>
> Anybody care to comment on its relevance in this situation? If I read it
> correctly, Clear Channel = Less Capacity. Doesn't sound right.
I know that most of NANOG has explained in detail about clear
channel T1s, but I thought this webpage would be a lot of help
if you never wanted to learn everything about T1s, but asked
anyway! 8-)
www.t1.org - Standards Committee T1 Telecommunications. This
webpage helped quite a bit when I was researching about T1/T3
test patterns (which is document tr_25.pdf,"A Technical Report
on Test Patterns for DS1 Circuits").
A more specific weblink is http://www.t1.org/html/trs.htm
I'm now going to unsubscribe to nanog-post before I do something
brain dead, e.g., continue a flamewar about DNS.
FYI,
Rachel
--
C++ - Where only your friends can access your private parts.
