[35875] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Statements against new.net?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Simon Higgs)
Sat Mar 17 03:22:08 2001
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010316204831.03313b90@oak.higgs.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 20:55:09 -0800
To: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>
From: Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <3AB2923E.2D6AA4A2@ehsco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 02:22 PM 3/16/01 -0800, you wrote:
Can someone point to working examples for this please? The last LDAP/DNS
system I checked was Verisign's and they appeared to take the LDAP query,
convert it to query whois and then convert the result back into an LDAP
response. The storage portion was not native LDAP.
>One possible solution to this is LDAP. A catalog server could build a
>cache of O and CN objects and associate them various locator attributes
>(like IP addresses, domain names and SRV RRs). This wouldn't even qualify
>as theoretical really, it would be pretty easy to do.
Best Regards,
Simon Higgs
--
It's a feature not a bug...
