[35764] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Statements against new.net?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Simon Higgs)
Thu Mar 15 17:13:15 2001
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010315124348.03d2f1b0@oak.higgs.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 12:48:28 -0800
To: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
From: Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <9DC8BBAD4FF100408FC7D18D1F092286039CC7@condor.mhsc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 09:22 AM 3/15/01 -0800, you wrote:
> > From: Stephen Stuart [mailto:stuart@mfnx.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 8:53 AM
> >
> > > IIRC, there was an "issue" around the assignment of
> > 16.1.16.1; I don't
> > > think lawyers had been invented back then, so the scope of
> > the scandal
> > > remained relatively small.
> > >
> > > (The coolness factor was the binary representation, of course.)
> >
> > Sorry, it was the hex representation, of course.
>
>HEX:=="313631313631"
>Leet:="ELEBELELEBEL"
>
>Sorry, I just don't get it ... Is there another coding overlay?
Hex: 10011001
Bin: 10000000000010001000000000001
Best Regards,
Simon Higgs
--
It's a feature not a bug...
