[35758] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Statements against new.net?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vadim Antonov)
Thu Mar 15 16:15:31 2001
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 11:55:43 -0800 (PST)
From: Vadim Antonov <avg@kotovnik.com>
To: smd@clock.org
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20010315145707Z27303-12219+5@cesium.clock.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.10103151154580.19939-100000@kitty.kotovnik.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Sean - you think i should dust off TRAP? What happened
to NIMROD?
--vadim
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001 smd@clock.org wrote:
>
> | How long will it be before they mandate IP address portability?
>
> If ISPs collectively mandated trivial site renumbering technology,
> it would never need to happen.
>
> Unfortunately most ISPs are quite happy to let migrating customers
> retain holes from other ISPs' PA blocks. Also, not enough people
> point out that this technology is just as lacking in IPv6 as in IPv4.
>
> This is the crux of the problem, and will hurt everyone.
>
> Sean.
>
