[35136] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 64.0.0.0/8 etc. [was: Re: BGP Question - how do work around...]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Tue Feb 27 18:27:28 2001
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:24:37 -0500
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010227182437.C32301@eiv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uXxzq0nDebZQVNAZ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0102270801060.7752-100000@moench.nielsen.net>; from cnielsen@nielsen.net on Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 08:01:46AM -0800
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--uXxzq0nDebZQVNAZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 08:01:46AM -0800, Christian Nielsen wrote:
>=20
> > For 64.0.0.0/8 this seems to have happened in the meantime... but now
> > there's a route for 62.0.0.0/8 (the RIPE equivalent of 64.0.0.0/8), sig=
h.
>=20
> i dont know why you even allow 64/8 and/or 62/8 into your network. Filter
> them...
Aren't many Earthlink dialups in 64/8?
Filtering that would mean his employees couldn't get Sprint DSL, and
prevent millions of potential customers from reaching his web servers.
That's not smart business. It's called "cutting off your nose to spite
your face."
--uXxzq0nDebZQVNAZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6nDc1Ecl9bQ0RMt0RAl74AKDNWhOoFaIRNXrLFwNHykAWBaco7wCfZgEa
SDays46G+p/E8kQ95sHeTuQ=
=Y5ie
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--uXxzq0nDebZQVNAZ--
