[35140] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 64.0.0.0/8 etc. [was: Re: BGP Question - how do work around...]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Tue Feb 27 19:07:00 2001
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:59:18 -0500
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010227185918.A32414@eiv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CKEOJFLLKMIPKODCKHKLEEDACAAA.dan@netrail.net>; from dan@netrail.net on Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 06:33:05PM -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 06:33:05PM -0500, Daniel Golding wrote:
> There are plenty of folks who have space in 64/8. However, no one should be
> classfully advertising 64.0.0.0/8, as it has not been assigned to any single
> entity.
Ever have one of those days where you bang your head against recalcitrant
users who don't understand why a Fortune 100 corporation would need
security policies all day, then come home and say something stupid on
a (inter)national mailing list where hundreds of people you might find the
desire to work for some day will read it?
:-/
--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6nD9WEcl9bQ0RMt0RAgIUAKD+XK8vE1s8oF3XhHX7zMGBNohFdgCfU2XH
4lxeyvTRuE9JriXPzwPpJeg=
=kK9R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0--
