[35065] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IXs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rich Sena)
Sun Feb 25 14:49:26 2001
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 14:45:00 -0500 (EST)
From: Rich Sena <ras@poppa.thick.net>
To: Josh Richards <jrichard@cubicle.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20010225001849.A15049@datahaven.freedom.gen.ca.us>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102251443400.27805-100000@poppa.thick.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I was under the impression that this was going to be transitioned out (at
least that is what my WorldCom rep told me about a year ago)...
On Feb 25, 2001 Josh Richards spake:
> Anyone give me an idea of what sort of traffic passes to (and hopefully
> thru!) their MAE-LA peers? It's hard to tell whether anyone cares about
> this NAP or not, and there appears to be significantly less potential
> peering partners connected to it. Makes for a tough ROI argument when
> compared to the other NAPs. While I realize some of this might be a
> critical mass issue, MAE-LA seems to have been fairly stagnant for several
> years now.
>
> While we're at it, have any input on PacBell's NAP? :-)
>
> BTW: Anyone considering connecting to Telehouse's 6IIX IPv6 exchange points
> at this point? They are collocated inside with NYIIX and LAIIX.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -jr
>
> ----
> Josh Richards [JTR38/JR539-ARIN]
> <jrichard@geekresearch.com/cubicle.net/fix.net/freedom.gen.ca.us>
> Geek Research LLC - <URL:http://www.geekresearch.com/>
> IP Network Engineering and Consulting
>
--
Rich Sena - ras@thick.net
ThickNET Consulting
"On the way to understanding; you understand, and forget."
