[35057] in North American Network Operators' Group
IXs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Josh Richards)
Sun Feb 25 03:28:37 2001
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 00:18:50 -0800
From: Josh Richards <jrichard@cubicle.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010225001849.A15049@datahaven.freedom.gen.ca.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e"
Content-Disposition: inline
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Anyone give me an idea of what sort of traffic passes to (and hopefully=20
thru!) their MAE-LA peers? It's hard to tell whether anyone cares about
this NAP or not, and there appears to be significantly less potential=20
peering partners connected to it. Makes for a tough ROI argument when=20
compared to the other NAPs. While I realize some of this might be a=20
critical mass issue, MAE-LA seems to have been fairly stagnant for several
years now. =20
While we're at it, have any input on PacBell's NAP? :-)=20
BTW: Anyone considering connecting to Telehouse's 6IIX IPv6 exchange points
at this point? They are collocated inside with NYIIX and LAIIX.=20
Thanks!
-jr
----
Josh Richards [JTR38/JR539-ARIN]
<jrichard@geekresearch.com/cubicle.net/fix.net/freedom.gen.ca.us>
Geek Research LLC - <URL:http://www.geekresearch.com/>
IP Network Engineering and Consulting
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjqYv+YACgkQ8VgqD3XNPNWANwCffi94VeX5zynu+xfMNIHn2Jan
t4MAoNAJie2wGEEtnKLIZtznP8K/6Skq
=COQi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e--
