[35061] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IXs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Golding)
Sun Feb 25 12:37:45 2001
From: "Daniel Golding" <dan@netrail.net>
To: "Josh Richards" <jrichard@cubicle.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 12:31:19 -0500
Message-ID: <CKEOJFLLKMIPKODCKHKLAEBOCAAA.dan@netrail.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <20010225001849.A15049@datahaven.freedom.gen.ca.us>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
MAE-LA has never been very hot. Same with NYIIX. PAIX in SFR, MAE-West, and
PacBell are all hotter, although PacBell seems to be in decline. In the NY
area, 111 8th ave is a far better spot than 25 Broad, which is where NYIIX
is located.
- Daniel Golding
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of Josh
Richards
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 3:19 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: IXs
Anyone give me an idea of what sort of traffic passes to (and hopefully
thru!) their MAE-LA peers? It's hard to tell whether anyone cares about
this NAP or not, and there appears to be significantly less potential
peering partners connected to it. Makes for a tough ROI argument when
compared to the other NAPs. While I realize some of this might be a
critical mass issue, MAE-LA seems to have been fairly stagnant for several
years now.
While we're at it, have any input on PacBell's NAP? :-)
BTW: Anyone considering connecting to Telehouse's 6IIX IPv6 exchange points
at this point? They are collocated inside with NYIIX and LAIIX.
Thanks!
-jr
----
Josh Richards [JTR38/JR539-ARIN]
<jrichard@geekresearch.com/cubicle.net/fix.net/freedom.gen.ca.us>
Geek Research LLC - <URL:http://www.geekresearch.com/>
IP Network Engineering and Consulting
