[35037] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:Update_for_noc_=2Enl_problem=2E=2E?=
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Fraizer)
Fri Feb 23 16:57:33 2001
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 16:55:22 -0500 (EST)
From: John Fraizer <nanog@Overkill.EnterZone.Net>
To: CARL P HIRSCH <CARL.P.HIRSCH@slchicago.infonet.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <3a96d6ed6d49001infonet88*@x400gw.infonet.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102231653440.29706-100000@Overkill.EnterZone.Net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On 23 Feb 2001, CARL P HIRSCH wrote:
>
> I'm curious - how many ISPs hold to this kind of policy of being tight-lipped
> until subpoenaed?
>
> Personally, I'm kind of glad to see this response from @home. I know I would
> want to see an ISP I used do the same thing if confronted by The Law. Maybe
> that's just the Bill of Rights lover in me.
>
> Having said that, it sucks that they're forcing you to get the lawyers and the
> cops involved. I'd often prefer to see things handled on an informal basis of
> professional courtesy. Especially when real damage is done such as in your case.
>
> -carl hirsch
> network analyst
> sargent & lundy llc
>
We won't release information but, we certainly will freeze log files and
perhaps even thump the customer on the head with the "Bright Platinum
Baseball Bat of Truth" until the subpoena does arrive.
---
John Fraizer
EnterZone, Inc
