[33924] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: peer "sanity" filters - best practices?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vincent Gillet)
Thu Jan 25 04:34:40 2001
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 10:24:57 +0100
From: Vincent Gillet <vgi@opentransit.net>
To: Christian Nielsen <cnielsen@nielsen.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010125102457.A23095@opentransit.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0101241728240.5081-100000@moench.nielsen.net>; from cnielsen@nielsen.net on Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 05:36:18PM -0800
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Hey Christian,
cnielsen@nielsen.net disait :
> well... everyone has different ways of doing it. basicly we do the
> following.
>
.....
>
> this should be a good start for anyone looking to do filtering.
We do similar for France Telecom, but we also filter all IX point we are
connected to.
We saw many time some big private peers that announce IX Lan we are both
connected on.
What's about your practice regarding IX Lan filtering ?
We have same "sanity" filters either for BGP customer or peers.
V
