[31932] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: InterNAP?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex)
Mon Oct 30 20:59:58 2000
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 21:01:23 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
From: Alex <alex@nac.net>
To: Mike Johnson <mike.johnson@isunnetworks.com>
Cc: Tom Schmidt <tsch52@hotmail.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20001030185230.B6489@i-sun.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.21.0010302100340.876-100000@shakalaka>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> > InterNap has some technology to avoid congested peering points. Does this
> > technology actually work? Isn't it impossible to avoid these peering
> > points? What are your experiences with InterNAP?
>
> I'm not a customer, but I spoke with a salesdriod there. All they do
> is go in, set up their own geographicly disperse private peering points
> and link them together with their private backbone. They set these
Wrong. The PNAPs are islands and are not connected together. I'm not
saying which is better or worse.
You're thinking Savvis.
