|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 02:08:37 -0400 (EDT) From: John Fraizer <nanog@EnterZone.Net> To: "Majdi S. Abbas" <msa@samurai.sfo.dead-dog.com> Cc: nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <20001019121236.A12212@samurai.sfo.dead-dog.com> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010210154540.7109-100000@Overkill.EnterZone.Net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Majdi S. Abbas wrote: > > If folks running networks really think website designers and owners > > should care about caching, then there needs to be some sort of benefit > > (perhaps paid in dollars) to those affected. Otherwise, there's little > > reason for them to care. > > Think again. When potential customers dollars walk to the > competition, you will start caring. I'm not going to pay you so that > my customers can visit your site and buy things from you -- that's > completely out of the question. > > --msa > Your customers are paying YOU to provide end-to-end connectivity on the internet. If that involves a settlement based peering arrangement, you're saying that it is completely out of the question? Have fun with your non-connected network. I'm betting on your customers dollars will RUNNING to the competition. --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |