[31417] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vijay Gill)
Fri Sep 22 19:15:11 2000
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 15:44:50 -0400
From: Vijay Gill <vijay@umbc.edu>
To: Kai Schlichting <kai@pac-rim.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20000922151549.03063430@mail.conti.nu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.21L.01.0009221542120.324240-100000@irix1.gl.umbc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Kai Schlichting wrote:
[ http://www.employees.org/~tbates/cidr.plot.html for a plot ]
> of engineering experience announcing 32 /24's out of their scattered
> POPs in addition to their /19 aggregate because they can't get their
> load balancing right without it or have never heard of the 'NO_EXPORT'
> attribute (I could point fingers now)?
I suspect data from inside providers with aggressive filtering policies
might prove to be interesting.
Some promising local providers were past the 150k mark a while ago for sum
(internal + global bgp) routes and were growing superlinearly the entire
time because of the ever increasing number of customers.
/vijay
