[28698] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: CIDR Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Kent)
Sat May 13 12:22:55 2000
Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 09:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200005131620.JAA18941@noc.mainstreet.net>
From: Mark Kent <mark@noc.mainstreet.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1000513004118.27709a-100000@ns>
(pjnesser@Nesser.COM)
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
>> Take a look at: http://www.employees.org/~tbates/cidr.hist.plot.html
I think the other parts of the data also point to shoddy aggregation
(not that this is new). Look at some of the /8 nets that have been
broken down and you'll see some sequences crying out for order.
I see (approximately) this right now:
600 pieces of net 12
850 pieces of net 24
1600 pieces of net 63
900 pieces of net 64
Just eyeballing the announcements shows that this could be a *lot*
smaller. But even if all we saw were /19s in there we could expect
to see 2048 /19s per /8, which is larger than what we see now.
Is there data that shows the possible "NetGain" over the past 6 years?
And if so, is it getting better or worse?
-mark
