|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Message-ID: <20000320205320.6732.qmail@hotmail.com> From: "Ron Buchalski" <rbuchals@hotmail.com> To: fkittred@sss1.gwi.net, nanog@merit.edu Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 12:53:20 PST Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu >From: Fletcher E Kittredge <fkittred@sss1.gwi.net> >Reply-To: fkittred@sss1.gwi.net, nanog@merit.edu >To: "Ron Buchalski" <rbuchals@hotmail.com> >CC: nanog@merit.edu, gwi-network@sss1.gwi.net >Subject: Re: Cisco's CNR vs ISC Bind/DHCP >Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 15:43:28 -0500 <snip> > We are about to deploy an additional cable network and a DSL >network. Before using ISC again, I wanted to check that there had >been no change in Cisco CNR status, that might lead us to do a full >blown evaluation again (these things cost money.) I haven't turned up any >evidence that there have been any changes useful to larger >installations like ours. If you have information to the contrary, >please let me know. What version are you currently using? -rb ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |