|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Message-ID: <20000317182630.32864.qmail@hotmail.com> From: "Ron Buchalski" <rbuchals@hotmail.com> To: fkittred@sss1.gwi.net, nanog@merit.edu Cc: gwi-network@sss1.gwi.net Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:26:30 PST Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu Fletcher writes: >From: Fletcher E Kittredge <fkittred@sss1.gwi.net> >To: nanog@merit.edu >CC: gwi-network@sss1.gwi.net >Subject: Cisco's CNR vs ISC Bind/DHCP >Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 17:02:37 -0500 > >We are working here with the hypothesis that Cisco's CNR product is a >lamer and inferior in quality to the Internet Software Consortium's >open source DNS and DHCP software. Is this a generally accepted >hypothesis, or are we off in the weeds (again) by ourselves on this >one? > >thanks! >fletcher Well, Fletcher, considering that you probably don't know anything about the product, do you really feel it necessary to publicly bash it? On what information to you base your bold assertion? Would you appreciate it if people had similar assumptions about: http://www.gwi.net/ ??...... Go to: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/cisco/mkt/enm/cap/cnr/index.shtml and download a free (limited-time) copy of CNR to check it out. -rb ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |