|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 23:03:44 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Wallingford <brian@meganet.net> To: William Allen Simpson <wsimpson@greendragon.com> Cc: Jeff Ogden <jogden@merit.edu>, nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <38B571AF.7E73897C@greendragon.com> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10002242231120.8533-100000@cerise> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu : > So what is the real story here? Is all, most, some of our : > international Internet traffic being intercepted by various : > governments? Is it only international traffic that is at issue or is : > domestic traffic within the US subject to routine eavesdropping : > without a court order? : > : The US government has had listening devices at the MAEs/NAPs for years. : They have also patented techniques for sorting and classifying : conversations, which appear to be applicable to Internet traffic. : : As for other governments, haven't you heard Moscowitz's Chrysler story? : : : > Have I been misleading people? : > : While Merit has done an admirable job internally of organizing its : networks, so that customer traffic doesn't pass by client machines : and would be difficult to monitor, other ISPs and companies are not : so diligent. Specifically, what have Merit, and presumably yourself done that any reasonably clued ISP hasn't? Aside from responsible subneting, and standard non-intrusive filtering, what can be done? It seems to me that beyond that, the burden of safeguarding data falls on the end-user. -brian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |