| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Message-ID: <38B094B5.70D63B7F@greendragon.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 20:28:31 -0500
From: William Allen Simpson <wsimpson@greendragon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: nanog@merit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Rodney Joffe wrote:
> On the other hand, I believe that there *is* an overwhelming public
> interest issue as far as typical whois type data is concerned. The
> ability to reach responsible parties during network events like DOS
> attacks, bogus announcements, domain failures, spam runs, etc. are
> necessary.
>...
> So, a fundamental decision has to be made:
>
> Is it important for parties that control DNS data (domain names and
> address space) that are connected to "the network" to be identifiable to
> the community at large, and reachable?
It is important.
> If so, a replacement rfc needs to be developed.
A replacement for what?
Don't we already have plenty of documents describing the protocols?
Are you referring to a BCP?
WSimpson@UMich.edu
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |