[27467] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: whois broke again?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Allen Simpson)
Sun Feb 20 23:35:24 2000

Message-ID: <38B094B5.70D63B7F@greendragon.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 20:28:31 -0500
From: William Allen Simpson <wsimpson@greendragon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: nanog@merit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


Rodney Joffe wrote:
> On the other hand, I believe that there *is* an overwhelming public
> interest issue as far as typical whois type data is concerned. The
> ability to reach responsible parties during network events like DOS
> attacks, bogus announcements, domain failures, spam runs, etc. are
> necessary. 
>...
> So, a fundamental decision has to be made:
> 
> Is it important for parties that control DNS data (domain names and
> address space) that are connected to "the network" to be identifiable to
> the community at large, and reachable? 

It is important.

> If so, a replacement rfc needs to be developed. 

A replacement for what?

Don't we already have plenty of documents describing the protocols?

Are you referring to a BCP?

WSimpson@UMich.edu
    Key fingerprint =  17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26  DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post