[27466] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: whois broke again?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roeland M.J. Meyer)
Sun Feb 20 19:49:52 2000
From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
To: "William Allen Simpson" <wsimpson@greendragon.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 16:47:56 -0800
Message-ID: <NDBBJKGADKGFDIKIHOBJMEEMCFAA.rmeyer@mhsc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <38B0539A.BCC23835@greendragon.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Rodney said what I was going to, but I'll add this
http://www.opensrs.org/
If you can stomache that, then I have more of the same.
For the record, I've tried to get you guy's attention with this stuff over
two years ago. Y'all strongly told me it was non-operational. But, when
systems start failing, and it becomes an operational issue, it's way too
late.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
> William Allen Simpson
> Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2000 12:51 PM
> To: Roeland M.J. Meyer
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: whois broke again?
>
>
>
>
> "Roeland M.J. Meyer" wrote:
> > Then I suggest that you do. I wouldn't sign the NDA, but you might.
> >
> What NDA? It's draft-hollenbeck-rrp-01.txt.
>
> But this is irrelevant to the whois discussion.
>
>
> > With SRS, this is no longer possible as the whois data is already
> > distributed among NSI's channel market, the Registrars. Each
> are independent
> > entities. The only real target you have to fire at is the ICANN. GFL ...
> > they're broke.
>
> I think we must be talking at cross purposes. The domain whois data is
> located in whois servers, maintained by the NSI registry. It is
> updated by registrars.
>
> The NSI registry whois seems to be falling down and cannot get up.
> We need a good system of distributed whois servers, just as we have
> a robust system of distributed DNS servers.
>
> We've talked about this before. Rather than complaining about NSI,
> folk need to get off their duffs and make it happen.
>
> I don't have the kind of bandwidth that we should have at the whois
> servers, so I cannnot offer space. All I can do is chearlead (and
> write code).
>
> Are we lacking an incremental distribution protocol for whois?
>
> What about rwhois? (RFC-2167 Informational)
>
> What about whois++? (RFC-1913 & 1914 Proposed Standards)
>
> WSimpson@UMich.edu
> Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
>
