| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Message-Id: <200002131915.LAA19747@gateway.digitaria.com> From: "Chris Adams" <chris@digitaria.com> To: "nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 11:16:55 -0800 Reply-To: "Chris Adams" <chris@digitaria.com> In-Reply-To: <E12JeK3-0004pU-00@rip.psg.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu On Sat, 12 Feb 2000 07:18:59 -0800, Randy Bush wrote: >> it is a necessary evil that we settle this ourselves. because if we don't >> take care of our own business, someone's going to step in and do it for >> us, and we won't like it. > >as the problem is quite technical, and the ingress filtering is a small >panacea not a fix, not bloody likely While I agree that it's exceedingly unlikely that they'd actually solve the problem, I've yet to see a politician who won't try to do *something*, even if it would be ineffectual or counterproductive. A "Protection of E-Commerce" bill is entirely too plausible - just imagine how many politicians would love to run "I saved the Internet" ads during their next campaign.
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |