[27321] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Blech!

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Ferguson)
Fri Feb 11 22:37:50 2000

Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000211223209.00a50c40@lint.cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 22:35:57 -0500
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


I hate to ask this, but can't bite my lip, given the
fact that people are throwing lawyers at this stuff now.

Is it within the realm of possibility that ISP's will
start to craft SLA's, peering & transit agreements, to
include who is responsible for ingress filtering?

I would think so.

Also, if so, do you think that this would technically be
effcient, given that the filters would actually be applied?

Feel free to be silent,

- paul



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post